Post by LlalassuSkry on Jan 27, 2018 21:45:26 GMT -8
During the past aeon, which was naturally very male oriented (in which many men definitely over-hegemonized, this natural aeonic weight of focus sometimes inspiring them to overconfidence, even), there was some formulation of rude terminology concerning what aspect of the feminine physical they like best, or tend to focus on... Even though there was per that aeonic some special focus on males, it would have been better had certain terms been kept more secret, such as "girl watching", etc.; better had promiscuous men (as they often became reputed as) to have been only secretly promiscuous. Currently, a highlight of focus renders such issues more clear. The proof of what I say was apparent in suffering, misfortune or ruin which would often befall; it began to appear to strain gender relations, inspiring contempt in women; lost upopularity. What was actually love-corruption during the past aeon was not as clearly highlighted, or in contrast as such as it is currently, generally. Clitoaral men are men who are attuned to women especially as you might say, "Honored Bearers Of The Clitoariss" This can show up in the birth-omens, astrological or numerological, although not in any available material I've seen... In the ancient Sumerian pantheon, Nin-Imma and Nin-Mag were delineated- goddesses of the vagheina and the vhulva respectively; nothing about a goddess of the clitoariss, however. I believe I'm correct that attunement with these divinities isn't especially good for love or attraction; understanding and filial familiarity with woman can increase however. Some hindu women have been coming forth with the claim that American women don't experience clitoaral orgaxm, whereas they do- I believe that American young women are usually very clitoaral, but lose this with age- I mean those who in the Book Of Tarot would be represented by a Princess rather than a Queen...