-0+ ( Positive, Negative, Neutral )

[Sammy]

Religious experience based from laws of energy and a thermodynamic enviroment. The following results are in no way conclusive and only pertain to thus far, for the sake of study.

When entering into this its best to start simple, and that is to define oneself. Are we the mass we see before us? Or are we the memory of what that mass has done? Can you explain who you are with no memory of it? One isnt possible without the other, but wich is us in truth? The action and thought themselves are pulses of energy simply reforming the mass (I.E. muscle mass and memory.)

The energy that is scanned through various machines from our brain, is the echo of the that pulse. These waves are outside of ourselves incredibly more so then inside if compared to the whole process. We are completely surrounded by waves of energy of so many types, there is no hope of detecting them all. The rule of energy is it can never be created nor destroyed only change form or transfer.

Comparing this to religion Is various but common in some areas. Ill break it down to two things for this description. The mind of light and the mind of shadow. Our energy would work like that of gravity in this feild pulling toward the side that connects to us best. Innevitably becomming who we are in unwavering truth.

When you think of a light bulb you might have a few thoughts pop up. What makes this happen is the filament. A tiny wire of focused electricity creating friction in the metal (the metal doesnt flow like free electricity) heating up and turning white hot, thus creating the light. If enough energy is heading in the same direction through a medium, it will create "light". In return the light will cast a shadow when encountering a mass.

The tricky part is retaining the body during this interaction. A filament like our body will get burned out. The body like the filament has done its "job" and the energy is going to do what it set out to do.

If a body after life is attainable, in either mind its left up to our choices depending on wich way it flows. The body/existance would be created from the memory it had the most pull. Making a individual "home" based from that wich was considered to be "you". leaving the home closer or further away from where the lines of light are going. The lines are different but will all result at the same end (one of the two minds).

The other common thing in most religions is "the battle" either in body(politics, society) or spiritualy. If these energy flows are in conflict it starts with where they interact (mass/our body and mind). We are inbetween the Earth and our energy. Our earliest discovery was good things are good and bad things are bad. Even in our own personal lives we know this truth. If we only have two choices of "minds" to choose from, wich do we want our home constructed from? This question takes a lifetime to answer.

[Sammy]

I should probably add this in addition to "the mind tool".

The possitive and negative forces are what we use to create our center or "total options for the matter at hand". The right and wrong (black/white) would be the actual facts of what took place (known or unknown publicly). Outside of what others see we know our truths of events, but how it is seen is taken into acount before the acts themselves.

The main problem I have found with any line of thinking toward balance or wholeness, is that its impossible to be whole or complete if even one person is outside of your capacity. To find inner balance and wholeness is achievable but as I stated "its geared toward how what you do connects to others." and if others are outside of your reach the whole is 1 less, and that makes it a seperation. No matter how big or small the seperation it is not whole.

The more you go in search in yourself to reach others, the more is shown to you that your path is not alone. This search has gone on for thousands of years and in every way possible. The idea of wholeness is not new, but putting the ideals before yourself is what leaves your mark on that path in a new form.

What we want as individuals and what others want is very similair to how we deal with what our mind wants and what our body wants. The offset in this interaction is our consciousness being able to discern one from the other and place it to our liking (if the person thinks toward doing so), many have resigned themselves to listening to thier body and forgetting the mind shapes our body and character as much as the other way around.

Everything stems from our conscious choices and is our true center of self. At this level in basic form is blank because outside of any thought a mind is just that and outside of a signature. Our choices create that signature and frame it into our character and how we rely on our brains responses for interaction. This is why we need to be responsible for how its seen and obsolve difference in how our acts are understood.

Also, using our failings as a step up is how we learn. We just have to get used to admitting it when it happens. An individual is as responsible with connecting to someone as that someone is in response. It seems like the only thing we miss in a world united is a common ground, wich is rediculous because its been the same ground forever. Just neither side wants to relinquish ownership (be it ideas or dirt) because of what they can gain. Im just curious what we could gain if we shared our ground toward a common and truely universal goal.

[Sammy]

Wow OK big time connection today. I believe it is mostly self explanatory, other then the other two diagrams are the qabalistic tree of life (top), and the Kundalini rising (bottom). I will be working on a better quality diagram.

[Sammy]

I have come up with a few issues with my original design when fitting Kundalini rising, and Kabbalistic Tree of Life diagrams into mine. My description of my theory became MUCH easier once I didn't have to rely on defining the color within (individual life). I realized it only fit one way, after many failed attempts to combine the diagrams together.

There is also 36 lines going up and down, I had done this originally for fun because of the "36 Righteous Men". It ended up fitting quite well and had a lot to do with figuring out the final configuration. It also portrays the image of a person in the shadow of a pyramid.

[Sammy]

I see people today being stuck somewhere between what we see in front of us, what we see above us, what we see below us, and what we see behind us (metaphorically or literally). We know E = MC2 but how does that apply to our lives?



Saying for a second Japan's mathematicians were correct in assuming we are a 3D projection from a 2D surface, and also string theory and many other such related theories. We also know these variables work under natural laws, giving mass limits and definition so everything isn't a jumbled mess. We could say that all things within this system will have areas of systems that will grow into the next and vice versa, stemming from the center of this interaction. The center to our physical interaction would be the detonation point of the "big bang", then its fabric of unity transformed into the gravity we have deduced exists today.



However the center to our conscious interaction, is through the brain. The brain matter itself is just mass, but the mass and energy in harmony creates our consciousness across a board of memory. So our relative existence in truth is based through our conscious perception of it, then stored independently in our memory proteins and then passed on through the DNA. Without the storage of this memory we would have had no chance at evolution. This in turn became communication, then drawings, and finally language leading to everything else.



Since a genetic structure is active through a past and future pretense, we can also see this in our conscious activity in memory storage. Using the past and future thoughts or memories to define what our consciousness should connect to. Because this happens we can see memory/mass is also divided by the speed of light (electrical pulses), then squared (past and future). Leaving the consciousness as the observer in the interaction, and defining the line of the present between past and future.



Recap: Energy/light = mass/body, C2: speed of light/consciousness (squared by the past and future memories)





Here is then created a system of observance and the 3D world we experience today. I have deduced this system down to 7 aspects needed to describe what we see within it, and how we grow along our life spans.



1. Past genetic DNA/ Roots to the tree of life



2. Mass/Body/Shadow



3. Energy/Mind/Light



4. Past conscious activity/negative



5. Future conscious activity/positive



6. Future genetic DNA/ Tree of Life



7. Present conscious time/center of observation - This is also the starting and end point for each aspect, because we enter it by becoming aware of it and then leave it by becoming aware of the next.







The points in the diagram are a white "Kabbalistic Tree of Life" with another black one flipped 180 and overlaid. I combined the two "kingdom" points at the center as the grey ball. Keep in mind this is more of a doodle done with paint shop HAHA

[UttuqXul]

              I believe it's true, that we are faced with a decision every Seven seconds, seven minutes, seven hours, seven days, etc....  "connecting the dots" of continual best, or better decisions has been called The Law Of The Priesthood; Free Will Use as opposed to Abuse; part of a testing process which this existence represents.  I'm not sure this teaching is as good to recollect for the New Aeon, which doesn't have the characteristic trait of Severity... I don't know if I want to think of this existence as "Days" Of Probation- perhaps Days Of Auto-Definition?!  Rote Reality Sojourn Days Of The Eternal Voyager?!  That is the very Primal aeon, which cannot be defined as either Light or Dark- Even anterior to the Abraxas Aeon, I think.  Chaos is not yet.  Nuith IS,however... her Truth is that the Universe is a living, breathing, conscious entity; her number is Zero.  Fate has gone more into Concealment, in deference to Existence,  defined against a "background of" Non-Existence, in co-manifestation.  The Universe was completely asleep or inert during Wu Chi...        
          This interesting symbol, -0+ could perhaps also mean Chance, or Chances (as in Permutations); Charity Fate, or Wyrd...  That the topic of Permutations is like a highest, most Zen topic, some physicists began talking about the idea that God throws dice; for us it is Chance; for Moira, Fate it isn't...



       

[Sammy]

What it is im proposing, is that its not this thing or that thing but everything in its most simplistic form. Those most basic of paths, and then the extensions of those with the added diagrams tree of life. This would be above aeons, atoms, and everything even God "wrath and love of God". The trinity/+0-/pos.neg.neut./God/satan/spirit whatever you call this thought of polarity it will include all existence as the foundation for growth. Defense of said names has been one of the larger issues globally. I would also say with due cause as how we perceive the thoughts will dictate how it is expressed into reality.

[Sammy]

I had a bit of a epiphany with regards to the final alignments minus the genetic path. Closer to "The Mind Tool" diagram.

With the theory in perspective of being oneself, the field becomes thoughts and actions. The top half I usually would try to find its energy/spirit connection, but we can only speculate on its growth. Unless the prior thought leaves you knowing what the next step is with complete and founded certainty. Keeping things this simplified is not easy to track with all the perspectives involved however and took a long time to sort out

I was thinking about thoughts and how forming a new one is like putting pieces of a puzzle together, to form the full thought leading to a action. But the full picture is different depending on the thoughts/pieces leading to the action.

Using the diagram it would take parts from the bottom half to reach a destination on the upper half. But in the diagram the center is the target to reach for a full spectrum resolution to the thought.

So if the destination achieved was not centered, it over shoots into the upper half. Also not a finished product.

Things now (to me) show a need for growth on the upper half. But is dependant on a stable foundation/center to grow thoughts. But things work like math, what you do on one side of a line is done equally to the other side to result in a correct answer. Starting with a single centered thought, it can be built upon to increase the size of other accomplished centered thought. Building on the center construct. This would now make previously over shot thoughts, now achievable as centered ones in unison with the rest of the field.

In conclusion, it was required for me to do this process to come to these results. I hope this clarifies as much for you all as it did for me.

[Sammy]

This "first" thought or foundation thought. It would be like a source code for what follows. My only guess on what it could be, would be what I call heaven. But eternal existence is perspective. Heaven would be the final construct on top, and not the source thought leading to it. Also if things have to be centered/balanced/equal, in a social setting this would be equality.

So would equality or thoughts of it, be the source code to heaven? This fits well unless there is something im missing. However this construct of eternal R&R or whatever you see as heaven is made through the observer(once you die there is less chance for growth having no brain to attach A to B). You just live it instead of build on it.

This is where equality comes in to what I was saying. Because for these constructs to all be made to their entirety, they all have to be balanced/equal/centered. Making all constructs, the same single construct, with every individual one included.